In my short review of The Ask and the Answer I mentioned the concept of Scene and Sequel and the fact that there was a high proportion of Scene (action on the page) in the first two volumes, and not so much Sequel (reaction to the scene, interior monologue, point of view stuff). The characters’ choices made sense, as did the changes they went through (or didn’t go through). And they connected seamlessly-setting, characters, conflict. Monsters had to follow Ask which had to follow Knife. It worked well for Tolkien, right? Anyway, there’s no hint of afterthought here. I have no idea how Patrick Ness wrote the trilogy, but the way it reads is one big ambitious story split into thirds, much like The Lord of the Rings was initially one big book that for marketing purposes was sliced into three pieces. The breakneck pace I noted in my review of The Knife of Never Letting Go and my abbreviated-I ain’t got time for no stinking review ‘cause I got to get on to the next one-review of The Ask and the Answer continues, only slightly throttled down, in Monsters of Men, the third, and unfortunately, final, book in the Chaos Walking series.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |